RollingWithMyOhms

poldberg:

While there is a lot of appropriate rage about Ferguson right now, the killing of John Crawford, III is getting less attention than it deserves. I put Shaun King’s tweets and history lesson on the matter in chronological order for easier consumption.

Links:

Autopsy and video show John Crawford shot from behind in Wal-Mart

Witness in murder of John Crawford changes story

You really should be following Shaun King on Twitter.

(via clyane)

tw-koreanhistory:

Gone In 41 Seconds — Police Quick to Kill Korean Artist

Feb 24, 2008

LA HABRA, Calif. — On the afternoon of December 31, 2007, two police officers encountered Michael Cho in the parking lot of a liquor store in La Habra, a small, generally quiet city in Orange County, California. It didn’t take long for the meeting to go bad. After less than a minute the officers unleashed a barrage of bullets on the 25-year-old artist, ending his life - and setting off an ongoing cascade of protests across Southern California’s Korean American community.

Computerized police logs obtained by New America Media suggest the officers quickly turned to deadly force when they confronted Cho, whom they suspected of vandalism. According to the Computer Automated Transcript documenting the incident, at 2:04 p.m. the cops contacted their dispatcher to say they’d located Cho. “Out with the subject near the liquor store,” the transcript reads. Just 41 seconds later they radioed dispatch again, this time saying they’d shot the suspect and now needed paramedics to attend to him. “Shot fired, Suspect down, Medics requested,” reads the transcript. In the aftermath of the killing, Cho’s family has publicly condemned the department, saying the officers rushed to shoot Cho, rather than using less lethal tools like pepper spray or Taser stun guns to subdue him.

“The police killed my son like a dog,” Cho’s mother, Honglan Cho, recently told the La Habra City Council. According to Shelly Lynn Kaufman, an attorney for the Cho family, the fusillade of bullets left ten holes in his body.

Read More: http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=ad58d8b8031a47854d3676200f5c5be5 

(via shadow-pop)

rap1993:

pussy-pat:

christel-thoughts:

this is what i just picked up from the grocery store. it cost $32. Thirty. two. dollars. for 1 pineapple, 2 bags of grapes, a small container of raspberries, 1 soft drink and 2/$1 nuts…. 
do you know how much junk food i could have for $32? do you have any clue how much McDonald’s you can get for $32?
stop shaming fat people poorer than you or people poorer than you in general for not eating healthier. stop lying about how cheap it is or how it’s comparable to fast food. just stop.

!!!!!!!

THANK YOU

rap1993:

pussy-pat:

christel-thoughts:

this is what i just picked up from the grocery store. it cost $32. Thirty. two. dollars. for 1 pineapple, 2 bags of grapes, a small container of raspberries, 1 soft drink and 2/$1 nuts…. 

do you know how much junk food i could have for $32? do you have any clue how much McDonald’s you can get for $32?

stop shaming fat people poorer than you or people poorer than you in general for not eating healthier. stop lying about how cheap it is or how it’s comparable to fast food. just stop.

!!!!!!!

THANK YOU

(via davidohdrums)

bootedcupid:

glitterlion:

labrujamorgan:

invisibleblackunicorn:

micdotcom:

Facebook is putting drag queens in danger by forcing them to use their real names

Facebook should read up on its queer history: You never want to mess with drag queens.
Claiming the use of legal names will “keep our community safe,” Facebook has begun shutting down the profiles of individuals who do not to use their “real” or legal names when creating and logging into their accounts. The new requirement is drawing the ire of many in the LGBT community who argue it is a policing tactic that could be harmful to both artistic and queer communities. 
How you can join the fight against Facebook


I like how this is focused on Drag Queens instead of trans women, women who are leaving abusive relationships, closeted non-het/non-cis people, you know people who legit might die cause of bullshit like this.

and like i’ve run into this thing where drag queens use their drag persona’s facebook to be violent, virulent racists and transmisogynists. they will say and post the worst things and than you don’t know who they are, only their drag persona. 

yes to the bold commentary above.

Oddly enough, I’ve known both cis people and trans* people use alternate personas to be violent, virulent racists and misogynists. Is it at all possible that being a proponent of abuse, prejudice and discrimination does NOT depend on your background?
Come on. This is important to all of us. To me as a trans* man, to the drag queens who have been hunted down and killed for being men who dress effeminately, to transwomen who are killed for being themselves, to young trans* people who may be outed to their Facebook friends, to cis people who use alternate names to avoid abuse, to everyone.
We need to stand as a community on this, we can’t sit around waving oppression flags and bickering over who is more important. This news article focuses on drag queens, because those people are the main targets of FB’s horrendous new policy. Don’t try and erase the effect this has on the drag community, and don’t try and slander them so you can talk about “more important people”.
(Yes labrujamorgan, I am talking about you. Your comment was slander and added nothing to the conversation.)
It’s important to talk about the effect this has on trans* people, but not by erasing the effect of this on the drag community. This is not the time for SJWs to derail the conversation because “someone has it worse”. This is not the time for Tumblr to be all “omg cis boys eWW NO”. This affects everyone in different ways, and we need to present a united front if we are to have any hope of killing this thing.
So take a deep breath.
Chill.
And join the fight.

bootedcupid:

glitterlion:

labrujamorgan:

invisibleblackunicorn:

micdotcom:

Facebook is putting drag queens in danger by forcing them to use their real names

Facebook should read up on its queer history: You never want to mess with drag queens.

Claiming the use of legal names will “keep our community safe,” Facebook has begun shutting down the profiles of individuals who do not to use their “real” or legal names when creating and logging into their accounts. The new requirement is drawing the ire of many in the LGBT community who argue it is a policing tactic that could be harmful to both artistic and queer communities. 

How you can join the fight against Facebook

I like how this is focused on Drag Queens instead of trans women, women who are leaving abusive relationships, closeted non-het/non-cis people, you know people who legit might die cause of bullshit like this.

and like i’ve run into this thing where drag queens use their drag persona’s facebook to be violent, virulent racists and transmisogynists. they will say and post the worst things and than you don’t know who they are, only their drag persona. 

yes to the bold commentary above.

Oddly enough, I’ve known both cis people and trans* people use alternate personas to be violent, virulent racists and misogynists. Is it at all possible that being a proponent of abuse, prejudice and discrimination does NOT depend on your background?

Come on. This is important to all of us. To me as a trans* man, to the drag queens who have been hunted down and killed for being men who dress effeminately, to transwomen who are killed for being themselves, to young trans* people who may be outed to their Facebook friends, to cis people who use alternate names to avoid abuse, to everyone.

We need to stand as a community on this, we can’t sit around waving oppression flags and bickering over who is more important. This news article focuses on drag queens, because those people are the main targets of FB’s horrendous new policy. Don’t try and erase the effect this has on the drag community, and don’t try and slander them so you can talk about “more important people”.

(Yes labrujamorgan, I am talking about you. Your comment was slander and added nothing to the conversation.)

It’s important to talk about the effect this has on trans* people, but not by erasing the effect of this on the drag community. This is not the time for SJWs to derail the conversation because “someone has it worse”. This is not the time for Tumblr to be all “omg cis boys eWW NO”. This affects everyone in different ways, and we need to present a united front if we are to have any hope of killing this thing.

So take a deep breath.

Chill.

And join the fight.

boundunbound:

p0kemina:

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:


Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

Wake up call.(Pornography is not valid sex education)

I never thought about the baby thing. Of course.

boundunbound:

p0kemina:

quimbycub:

willow-wanderings:

nedahoyin:

queenqueerqutie:

Martin Bauendahl

Real life vs Societal expectations

Wow..

Yeah, news flash people, boobs generally only look “perky” while in a bra. A few are super lucky and have naturally perky boobs, most don’t. And this is because, SURPRISE, boobs are intended to feed babies and it’s hard for a baby being cradled in mum’s arm to reach a nipple that’s on the other side of the boob from where its mouth is.

Think of a soda fountain machine. The spouts are all pointing down, right? So you can put soda in a cup being held under the spout? If the spout was sticking straight out, it would be really hard to get a soda out of it.

Babies need to be able to reach a nipple easily so they can eat. Ergo, nipples are usually lower and angled more downward on a naturally hanging boob, both so it’s easier for a baby to reach and so gravity can do its part in pulling milk toward the nipple.
So there you go, outright ANATOMICAL proof that boobs are not there for the benefit of men.

Thank you for that. I never realized. Thanks.

Wake up call.

(Pornography is not valid sex education)

I never thought about the baby thing. Of course.

(Source: denicedenice, via belayalapa)

geistygeist:

milesjai:

ooooOOOOOOO

And now I have a new ship

(Source: amazingxmen, via starplatinumkush)

ritsukisa:

Uta from Tokyo Ghoul cosplay by rui

Do not remove sources.

(via lovelesskia)